{"id":5827,"date":"2020-06-29T11:58:31","date_gmt":"2020-06-29T10:58:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.innovationnewsnetwork.com\/?p=5827"},"modified":"2020-07-01T08:41:58","modified_gmt":"2020-07-01T07:41:58","slug":"us-research-at-the-lhc-the-benefits-of-cross-continental-collaboration","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.innovationnewsnetwork.com\/us-research-at-the-lhc-the-benefits-of-cross-continental-collaboration\/5827\/","title":{"rendered":"US research at the LHC: the benefits of cross-continental collaboration"},"content":{"rendered":"
Many US high energy groups and US funding agencies have contributed in a substantial way to the CMS and the Atlas experiment, the two large experiments at CERN\u2019s Large Hadron Collider<\/a> (LHC). The cross-continental collaboration between universities<\/a>, laboratory experimental groups, and funding agencies such as NSF and DOE are spread across the four LHC experiments: CMS, Atlas, LHCb, and Alice. In particular, the experiences of the US experimental groups in the CMS are typical of all US LHC experimental groups. They have contributed to all the elements of the CMS detector, including the CMS electromagnetic and hadronic calorimeters, muon detector, pixel and strip track detectors, trigger system, and detector electronics. The experiences and contributions of the University of Virginia<\/a> (UVa) group in the LHC and CMS are presented here as typical of the contributions of these groups.<\/p>\n By the 1990s, most US university and laboratory groups, including the UVa group, had spent 10 years of R&D and design for the Texas Supercollider effort until it was cancelled by the US Congress. At that point, many US groups interested in continuing experiments in truly frontier physics, while continuing their US programmes at Fermilab, Brookhaven<\/a>, and the Stanford Linear Accelerator Laboratories, turned their attention to Geneva, Switzerland and the LHC collider programme that was just beginning in 1993. This choice was not taken easily since all the groups making this decision understood the difficulty of redirecting resources and mounting an experimental effort across 4,000 miles of ocean in a time zone six hours different. Eventually, however, over the next decade, four experiments were proposed and developed for the LHC known as Atlas, CMS, LHCb, and Alice. To some extent, these experiments mirrored efforts that had been planned for the Texas Supercollider.<\/p>\n The transition of effort by the University of Virginia HEP group to the LHC from the Texas Supercollider at this time was typical of many other of the US groups and, as such, gives a good idea of the experiences and successes that the US groups have experienced at the LHC. From 1993 to 2008, in order to participate in the CMS experiment<\/a> at the LHC the UVa group (like many other US institutions) had to maintain cross-continental collaboration for the significant time that it took for the LHC accelerator construction to be finished and for first collisions to be initiated in 2010. In that time period, the four detectors for the four planned experiments were being prepared, and the UVa group, like other US groups, was heavily invested in the detector design and construction.<\/p>\n Like other US groups, the UVa group\u2019s choice of concentration on a given aspect of the CMS detector construction was a combination of their previous detector experience, their capabilities, and the opportunities that a particular detector element gave them to contribute to a particular kind of physics. In the case of UVa, the group determined its best fit to be in the CMS experiment and it therefore moved to become a part of it. In particular, the UVa group decided to participate in the development of the approximately 74,000 element Lead Tungstate PbWO4, electromagnetic barrel, and endcap calorimeter, as well as the CMS\u2019s hadronic endcap calorimeter.<\/p>\nA difficult choice<\/h3>\n
Transition<\/h3>\n