{"id":5794,"date":"2020-06-26T11:06:24","date_gmt":"2020-06-26T10:06:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.innovationnewsnetwork.com\/?p=5794"},"modified":"2020-06-26T11:06:24","modified_gmt":"2020-06-26T10:06:24","slug":"solving-the-problem-of-hydrogen-sulfide-on-a-fish-farm","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.innovationnewsnetwork.com\/solving-the-problem-of-hydrogen-sulfide-on-a-fish-farm\/5794\/","title":{"rendered":"Solving the problem of hydrogen sulfide on a fish farm"},"content":{"rendered":"
On many fish farms<\/a>, several water quality parameters (including toxic free CO2) are only measured manually at fixed times or in selected tanks. The water quality is fluctuating daily and are often following rhythmic patterns. With this method, you will often miss the peaks and therefore create a misleading result of a satisfying, stable CO2 level.<\/p>\n Fig. 1 presents actual data from a fish farm measured with Blue Unit\u2019s Lab Station. Here, the CO2 concentrations are measured six times a day in each tank and provides a realistic and reliable picture of the current water quality<\/a>. Whereas Fig. 2 presents the same data, but only with daily measurements (marked as red crosses on Fig. 1). This simulates an example of a fish farm performing manual measurements every morning.<\/p>\n