\u00a9 iStock\/halbergman<\/figcaption><\/figure>\nEnvironmental DNA sampling and conventional ship-based trawl net sampling were paired at seven sites in the port complex. At each of these sites, multiple eDNA samples were collected by the researchers just before the trawl net was towed through the same area. These samples were approximately one litre of seawater each. From this test, the team found that eDNA detected nearly all of the 17 species of fish found in the trawls, but also detected an additional 55 native fish species. To detect additional species through conventional sampling, more sampling trips at a very high expense are required. <\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n\u201cWe were happy to see eDNA validated alongside \u2018conventional\u2019 sampling, but we were really excited to see the extra information that came from the eDNA,\u201d said Dean Pentcheff, researcher and Programme Manager of the Diversity Initiative for the Southern California Ocean (DISCO) at NHM. <\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nHowever, a genetic sequence in an eDNA sample can only be resolved to a species if there is a reference sequence on file for that species, so finding that extra information depends on having a complete genetic reference library for all the fish in the area. In this study, all the fish in the environmental DNA samples were only resolved after the researchers added the last few fish references to the sequence library.\u00a0<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nThe eDNA samples from different locations in the ports produced significantly different species inventories. This showed the environmental DNA in this ocean environment can measure variability across a small area, exposing differences between places as close as a few hundred metres apart.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nRecommending the tool for future uses<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\nNow, the authors of the study have assembled a set of recommendations for managers considering environmental DNA as a tool for biodiversity assessment, based on this pilot project. The recommendations cover a careful selection of the identifying genes and specific advice on how to clean up the sequence data from eDNA samples before searching for sequence matches. Creating a regional reference database will be amongst the recommendations due to the successful species resolution that resulted from building a full sequence reference library.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n\u201cThese samples of the environment are like time capsules that we\u2019ll be able to exploit in the future,\u201d said Adam Wall, Crustacea Collections Manager at NHM. Another of the group\u2019s recommendations was prompted by this sentiment, archiving eDNA samples and sequence data for long-term use.\u00a0<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nFurther information could come from the samples as sequencing technology improves. The sequence data can be analysed again once genetic data analysis techniques improve and genetic reference libraries are expanded, to get additional results beyond the fish inventories published in this study.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Environmental DNA has been found to successfully assess changes in marine biodiversity when key implementation steps are followed.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":18,"featured_media":27447,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[24429],"tags":[700,745,3475],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n
Environmental DNA successfully assesses changes in marine biodiversity<\/title>\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\t \n\t \n\t \n \n \n \n \n \n\t \n\t \n\t \n