ReCell Center<\/a>, based at Argonne National Laboratory in the US, is a collaboration of industry, academia and national laboratories working together to advance recycling technologies along the entire battery lifecycle. The Center aims to grow a sustainable battery recycling industry by developing an economic and environmentally sound recycling process that can be adopted by industry for lithium-ion and future battery chemistries.<\/p>\nBryant Polzin, Deputy Director of the ReCell Center, spoke to The Innovation Platform<\/em> to discuss the current and future advancements in lithium-ion battery recycling, and how the Center\u2019s work is helping to secure a healthy supply chain.<\/p>\nWhat is the ReCell Center, why was it launched, and what are your key goals and objectives? \n<\/strong><\/h3>\nThe ReCell Center was launched by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)\u2019s Vehicle Technologies Office to advance lithium-ion battery recycling. The main technology that ReCell is focused on is called direct cathode recycling. In this process, LIB cathode materials are not broken back down into the elements, like in hydro or pyro metallurgical processing, but the battery materials are kept in a useable form to be put directly back into battery production. Several companies are working in the hydro and pyro metallurgical recycling field, but only a few are working in the direct recycling field.<\/p>\n
Despite the huge potential of this technology, there was a lack of companies working in the area. This prompted DOE to address some of the barriers to direct recycling technology.<\/p>\n
ReCell\u2019s main goal is to create a process flow that will allow a recycler of LIBs to be economically attractive and to be cost-neutral to the consumer when their EV reaches the end of its life. Today, recyclers\u2019 profits are driven by the cobalt and nickel content in batteries but, as the quantity of those materials decrease or are eliminated completely in batteries, the potential profit made by recyclers using hydro or pyro processing will be dramatically reduced. Therefore, to ensure some type of profitability, if a material can be recovered in a usable form and directly reintroduced into battery production, like in the direct recycling process, the potential for profitability would still be there even using low elemental cost material, like lithium iron phosphate (LFP).<\/p>\n
What battery recycling processes are currently being used for LIBs in the US? Which are working well and where could improvements be made? How soon can we automate the recycling process? \n<\/strong><\/h3>\nThere are two main recycling processes used today to recycle LIBs – pyrometallurgical and hydrometallurgical (with the third potentially being direct cathode recycling). Each process has its advantages and disadvantages when it comes to recycling.<\/p>\n
Smelting (pyrometallurgy) treats the input as if it were an ore, exposing it to high temperature (over 1100\u00b0C) to melt or burn all the components of the cell. The lithium and aluminium are lost to the process slag, which may find use as a cement additive, but are generally not economically recovered. The product of value is a mixed alloy of cobalt, nickel, copper, and some other metals, which must then be further treated to separate the metals into their various metal salts. They can then be reintroduced into the supply chain as raw materials for cathode production. This type of process is commercially mature and is used to process metals such as iron and copper on a very large scale.<\/p>\n
Hydrometallurgy, or leaching, is carried out on a large commercial scale (in China and Korea) and can convert a mixture of cell chemistries into product that can be reintroduced into the battery supply chain. Shredded cells are sieved to separate plastic and copper and aluminium foils for recycling elsewhere, and the remaining material is dissolved in strong acid. The products can be removed from the solution as separate metal salts to produce specific cathodes.<\/p>\n
Direct recycling is the recovery, regeneration, and reuse of battery components directly without breaking down their chemical structure. The concept is simple: keep the cathode crystal structure intact. By recovering crystalline material, several energy-intensive and costly processing steps can be avoided. Other cell components can also be recovered in near-final form. The main steps in direct recycling are size reduction, separation of the various components, and upgrading products back to battery-grade specifications. This process provides the quickest pathway to return materials to a battery. This method of recycling is still in the R&D stage, with additional work needed to make it a commercial process.<\/p>\n
In the future, all these recycling technologies will be utilised. There will be no right answer as to how advancing lithium-ion battery recycling will be conducted. As for improvements, for pyro and hydro metallurgical processing, process efficiency and an increase in materials that can be recovered in these processes are areas for improvement. For direct recycling, it is still at its early stages so the scaleup of these processes still needs work.<\/p>\n
As for automation of the recycling processes, we believe that it is still a long way off. There are several factors that will determine if automation is even an option in the long term. Currently, there is no standardisation of battery packs for EVs, so every vehicle is different, making it difficult for automation to handle the disassembly. A techno-economic modelling effort is currently underway to look at the cost and capacity of automated systems for EV pack disassembly. Hopefully, this will provide some guidance into what it would take to design an EV pack and associated automation to minimise the cost and maximise productivity.<\/p>\nTo keep up with increasing demand for lithium-ion batteries and to maintain a healthy battery supply chain, many organisations are now looking to advancements in battery recycling<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n