{"id":21697,"date":"2022-05-23T10:12:16","date_gmt":"2022-05-23T09:12:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.innovationnewsnetwork.com\/?p=21697"},"modified":"2022-07-31T18:16:36","modified_gmt":"2022-07-31T17:16:36","slug":"establish-eu-domestic-rare-earth-supply-chains","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.innovationnewsnetwork.com\/establish-eu-domestic-rare-earth-supply-chains\/21697\/","title":{"rendered":"How can we establish EU domestic rare earth supply chains?"},"content":{"rendered":"
The goal of establishing EU domestic rare earth supply chains is becoming an ever-increasing need and will be a fundamental requirement for energy-saving applications. We firmly believe these supply chains can be achieved if included in the European Union\u2019s Innovation Fund (IF).<\/p>\n
The IF is one of the world\u2019s largest funding programmes to demonstrate innovative low-carbon technologies and is perfect for all energy-saving applications. REIA\u2019s position paper in support of a proposed update to the Emissions Trading System (ETS) Directives AM-353 and AM-1189 to include the domestic production of rare earth permanent magnets in the EU is now urgent.<\/p>\n
Substituting rare earths is easier said than done, as rare earth permanent magnets in the drivetrain motor of EVs yield the efficiencies that make the EV\u2019s battery economics work.<\/p>\n
There is no shortcut to resolving the critical minerals supply chain conundrum \u2013 it takes a holistic approach of including all minerals and heavily incentivising the processing of primary and recycled materials in the EU. If one type of critical mineral (e.g. rare earths) is not addressed appropriately, then the policy prescription for battery materials \u2013 that has been successful so far \u2013 becomes inadequate.<\/p>\n
Rare earth permanent magnets (REPMs) provide the most energy-efficient technology solution for the drivetrain motors of EVs. For an EV to achieve a given range without using rare-earth permanent magnets in the drivetrain motor design, the energy loss will be higher. Therefore the battery will have to be around up to 30% larger.<\/p>\n
For the average passenger EV to be competitive enough in terms of performance compared to the average passenger internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicle, it would require 2kg of rare earth permanent magnets used in its drivetrain motor. In effect, to satisfy the EU\u2019s target of 30 million EVs manufactured and used by 2030<\/a>, there is a demand of approximately 60,000mt cumulatively for rare earth magnets (60,000mt x 31.5% = ~19,000mt of which is rare earth material) only for European EV manufacturers.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n In short, the lack of the correct type and magnitude of EU funding options for both CAPEX and OPEX to create a meaningful level playing field will prevent the private sector from proceeding further.<\/p>\n 1\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Market risk management<\/strong>: Addressed by the European Green Deal, setting expectations for industry to converge to the EU\u2019s 2050 climate targets;<\/p>\n 2\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Technology risk management<\/strong>: Addressed by the EU HORIZON funding programmes incentivising innovation and R&D collaboration; and<\/p>\n 3\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Financial risk management<\/strong>: Not addressed adequately yet for rare earths. For the European automotive manufacturing transition from ICE to EVs to be successful and for the corresponding automotive manufacturing jobs to be safeguarded instead of being offshored, the EU needs to ensure domestic resilient supply chains of critical raw materials.<\/p>\n The financial risk would benefit from financial support for EU domestic rare earth supply chains in the magnitude and unique ability of the EU Innovation Fund to support CAPEX and OPEX. It takes support of this kind to unlock the business cases of such strategic assets in smaller EU Member States. This funding tool has the unique ability to support both CAPEX and OPEX with sustainability-linked outcomes.<\/p>\n The financial support of the Innovation Fund unlocks large-scale business cases to address the policy challenge as swiftly as possible.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Expanding the scope of the Innovation Fund is a critical legislative step for establishing a competitive European rare earth separation and permanent magnet manufacturing supply chain.<\/p>\n Currently, Estonia has the only industrial-scale commercially operating rare earth midstream facility in the \u2018Western world\u2019. Unless the right economic incentives are created to develop magnet-making plants in Europe, European automotive, wind turbine and industrial pump manufacturers face consequential supply chain risks. To accomplish this expansion, there is an urgent need for both large-size CAPEX support and OPEX support to develop an independent rare earth value chain in the EU. There is the policy conundrum:<\/p>\n In effect, the IPCEI is a competition law exemption for EU Member States to provide direct state aid to industries of strategic European interest. Without this IPCEI exemption, state aid is not allowed. However, this direct state aid comes from the national government budgets, not from EU sources. This works well for the large-budget Member States (e.g. Germany, France, Italy, Spain etc.), but it is a very steep challenge for Member States with smaller (or constrained) national government budgets that have already established strategic assets of rare earths to build on (e.g. Slovenia and Estonia).<\/p>\n The EU Innovation Fund has the uniquely legislated exemption to allow for both CAPEX and OPEX funding. The rare earth industry<\/a> does not qualify for the EU Innovation Fund because the growth in our industry is driven by EV manufacturing \u2013 i.e. green mobility. By contrast, the EU Innovation Fund\u2019s evaluation criteria are constrained by the current Cost Fraction formula for GHG Avoidance.<\/p>\n 1\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 AM-353: www.europarl.europa.eu\/meetdocs\/2014_2019\/plmrep\/COMMITTEES\/ENVI\/AM\/2022\/03-22\/1245924EN.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n 2\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 AM-1189: www.europarl.europa.eu\/meetdocs\/2014_2019\/plmrep\/COMMITTEES\/ENVI\/AM\/2022\/03-22\/1249629EN.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n For media requests or to meet with REIA\u2019s members to discuss the reasons to support the proposed AM-353 and AM-1189 within the ETS Directive Update, please contact Dr Nabeel Mancheri using the details below.<\/p>\n Dr Nabeel Mancheri<\/strong> https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/gloreia\/?originalSubdomain=be<\/strong><\/a>What prevents the private sector from proceeding with large-scale rare earth projects?<\/h3>\n
When it comes to developing policy that shapes supply chains and mobilises the required private capital for establishing local production of rare earths, three risks require management:<\/h4>\n
Two primary technologies involved require critical raw materials: batteries and drivetrain motors.<\/h4>\n
\n
What it takes to address the financial risk for rare earth business cases in the EU<\/h3>\n
Policy options under consideration<\/h3>\n
Expanding the scope of the Innovation Fund<\/h3>\n
Rare earth strategic assets in the EU Member States<\/h3>\n
\n
Why an IPCEI alone cannot help in this case<\/h3>\n
Expanding the EU Innovation Fund offers a quick, win-win, and politically non-contentious solution<\/h3>\n
Two proposed amendments to the ETS Directive, currently under consideration at the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety (ENVI) in the EU Parliament are:<\/h4>\n
\nSecretary General<\/strong>
\nGlobal Rare Earth Industry Association (REIA) <\/strong>
\nnabeel.mancheri@global-reia.org<\/strong>
\nwww.global-reia.org<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n
\nhttps:\/\/twitter.com\/REIA_global<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n